Análisis de sistemas de control, Función de Transferencia, Sin categoría, Variables de estado

Converting a Transfer Function to State Space representation

To convert a transfer function into state equations in phase variable form, we first convert the transfer function to a differential equation by cross-multiplying and taking the inverse Laplace transform, assuming zero initial conditions. Then we represent the differential equation in state space in phase variable form. An example illustrates the process.

Example 1

Find the state-space representation in phase-variable form for the transfer function shown in Figure (1):

null
Figure 1

Step 1. Find the associated differential equation:

null

Cross-multiplying yields:

null

The corresponding differential equation is found by taking the inverse Laplace  Transform, assuming zero initial conditions:

null

Step 2. Select the state variables. Choosing the state variables as successive derivatives, we get:

null

Using this notation, we can rewrite equation (1) as:

null

Step 3. Differentiating both sides of the last equations, we must find _x1 and _x2, then we use Eq. (2) to find x3. Proceeding in this way we obtain the state equations. Since the output is c=x1, the combined state and output equations are:

null

Step 4. Expressing the last equations in vector-matrix form, we get the state-space representation of the system as:

null

At this point, we can create an equivalent block diagram of the systemof Figure 1(a) to help visualize the state variables.We draw three integral blocks as shown in Figure 1(b) and label each output as one of the state variables, xi(t), as shown.

A transfer function with a polynomial in s in the numerator

The transfer function of the previous Example has a constant term in the numerator. If a transfer function has a polynomial in s in the numerator that is of order less than the polynomial in the denominator, as shown in Figure 2(a), the numerator and denominator can be handled separately. First separate the transfer function into two cascaded transfer functions, as shown in Figure 2(b); the first is the denominator, and the second is just the numerator. The first transfer function with just the denominator is converted to the phase-variable representation in state space as demonstrated in the last example. Hence, phase variable x1 is the output, and the rest of the phase variables are the internal variables of the first block, as shown in Figure 2(b).

null

Figure 2

The second transfer function with just the numerator yields:

null

Where, after taking the inverse Laplace transform with zero initial conditions, we obtain:

null

But the derivative terms are the definitions of the phase variables obtained in the
first block. Thus, writing the terms in reverse order to conform to an output equation, we obtain:

null

Hence, the second block simply forms a specified linear combination of the state
variables developed in the first block.

From another perspective, the denominator of the transfer function yields the
state equations, while the numerator yields the output equation. The next example
demonstrates the process.

Example 2

Find the state-space representation of the transfer function shown in
Figure 3(a).

null

Step 1. Separate the system into two cascaded blocks, as shown inFigure 3(b).The
first block contains the denominator and the second block contains the numerator.

Step 2. Find the state equations for the block containing the denominator. We notice that the first block’s numerator is 1/24 that of Example 1. Thus, the state equations are the same except that this system’s input matrix is 1/24 that of Example 1.

Step 3. Introduce the effect of the block with the numerator. The second block of
Figure 3(b) yields:

null

Taking the inverse Laplace transform with zero initial conditions, we get:

null

But:

null

Hence:

null

Thus, the last box of Figure 3(b) ‘‘collects’’ the states and generates the output equation:

null

Although the second block of Figure 3(b) shows differentiation, this block was implemented without differentiation because of the partitioning that was applied to the transfer function. The last block simply collected derivatives that were already formed by the first block.

Thus, the full state-space representation of the system is:

null

Once again we can produce an equivalent block diagram that vividly represents
our state-space model:

null

Sources:

  1. Modern_Control_Engineering, Ogata 4t
  2. Control Systems Engineering, Nise
  3. Sistemas de Control Automatico, Kuo

 

Literature review by:

Prof. Larry Francis Obando – Technical Specialist – Educational Content Writer

I solve problems!!

WhatsApp:  +34633129287  Immediate Attention!!

Twitter: @dademuch

Copywriting, Content Marketing, Tesis, Monografías, Paper Académicos, White Papers (Español – Inglés)

Escuela de Ingeniería Electrónica de la Universidad Simón Bolívar, USB Valle de Sartenejas.

Escuela de Ingeniería Eléctrica de la Universidad Central de Venezuela, UCV CCs

Escuela de Turismo de la Universidad Simón Bolívar, Núcleo Litoral.

Contacto: España. +34633129287

Caracas, Quito, Guayaquil, Cuenca. 

WhatsApp:  +34633129287   +593998524011  

Twitter: @dademuch

FACEBOOK: DademuchConnection

email: dademuchconnection@gmail.com

Responder

Introduce tus datos o haz clic en un icono para iniciar sesión:

Logo de WordPress.com

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de WordPress.com. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Google photo

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Google. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Imagen de Twitter

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Twitter. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Foto de Facebook

Estás comentando usando tu cuenta de Facebook. Cerrar sesión /  Cambiar )

Conectando a %s